Is it OK to Like Lance Armstrong?

This week, federal investigators dropped doping charges against Lance Armstrong, ending countless efforts to legally implicate Armstrong in taking performance enhancing drugs, assisting him in winning a record 7 Tour de France titles.

To most Americans, Lance Armstrong is the most recognizable figure in the sport of cycling.  Good, bad or indifferent, this is true.  Members of the cycling community have their own varied opinions about who the #1 all time cyclist is, but Armstrong is a press hound.  He’s a commodity, a commercial success with celebrity tendencies.  Everyone recognizes him–in and out of the cycling community.

I’ve followed Lance’s career for roughly the last 12 years.  I’ve read books by him and on him, read countless articles, and participated in 4 of his cancer fundraisers for the LIVESTRONG Foundation.  I watched him race the Tour de France and duel with Jan Ullrich in the Alps.  His story was always compelling.  He was always exciting to watch.  He was a god of sorts, and I was taken in.

But did I like him?  Not really.

Lance has been described in so many ways: tenacious, determined, competitive, exacting, particular, specific, aggressive, demanding, arrogant, prickly, cocky and sometimes mean-spirited. Not very likable qualities. And while several of these personality aspects helped him win bike races and helped him beat cancer, I always got the impression he was the kind of guy who would create any advantage he could to optimize conditions for him to win.

Courtesy of the Chicago Tribune: Lance Armstrong in Court

I never wanted to believe that he doped.  He’s never wavered in his claims of innocence.  And the testing he submitted to for all those years seemed more than thorough–and at times, invasive. But I thought it would be foolish to believe otherwise.  It was the climate.  He was a top competitor.  Of course he did!  Everyone did.  It’s not right and I don’t agree with it, but to think otherwise is wildly naive.

So while federal charges have been dropped, he’s still the same guy.  I like what he’s done, but is he a nice person?  Sheesh, I don’t know about that.  I want to like him. He’s a great man who’s accomplished great things and has created a great charity that helps and inspires people with cancer.  But he seems like kind of a jerk.  If that’s true–it’s alright.  We don’t have to like him.  But we can appreciate his gifts, his talents, and his continuing mission to fight cancer.  So what if he’s a little prickly?  He’s Lance.  He can be whatever he wants to be.



Tags: , ,

About Karen

Mid-life female amateur athlete focused on cyclocross, mountain biking, and road cycling.

One response to “Is it OK to Like Lance Armstrong?”

  1. bgddyjim says :

    Eddy Merckx was the greatest ever. Greg LeMond was on par with Lance.

    Problem with Lance was he was all about one race. Either way, he was awesome. And Eddy flunked something like three more tests than Armstrong did.

    Europeans tend to have more of a problem with him, but that has more to do with where Lance came from.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: